Share This

Showing posts with label History. Show all posts
Showing posts with label History. Show all posts

Saturday, June 21, 2025

Global campaign to repatriate looted cultural relics gains momentum as voices demand justice, heritage restitution

 

Artifacts on display during a bronze repatriation ceremony in Abuja, the capital of Nigeria on December 20, 2022. Photo: VCG

Cultural artifacts are more than historical remnants; they embody the spirit of a nation and a civilization. 

In recent years, some countries have not only stepped up cultural preservation efforts, but also worked actively to recover artifacts looted during colonial times. Recently, the Global Times interviewed officials in Egypt and Nigeria, as well as representatives from civil groups in Japan and other countries, to learn how those looted treasures are making their way home.

'We cannot leave this to the next generation'

On June 14, 2025, Japanese civic organization Chinese Cultural Relics Return Movement Promotion Association hosted a public lecture in Tokyo that focused on Japan's wartime archaeological activities and cultural relics looted from China and called for the return of looted cultural relics and the reconstruction of related academic ethics, according to the Xinhua News Agency.

Founded in 2021, the civic group seeks to push for the return of relics taken during the First Sino-Japanese War, also known as the Jiawu War (1894-95), the Russo-Japanese War (1904-05) and the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression (1931-45).

Keiichiro Ichinose, a Japanese lawyer and the group's founder, told the Global Times that returning these artifacts is a necessary reckoning with Japan's imperialist and colonial past.

In 2012, the Palace Museum in Beijing published a catalogue listing 15,245 rare Chinese cultural artifacts that entered Japan between the First Sino-Japanese War and the end of World War II in 1945. From 1931 to 1945, Japan looted 1,879 crates of Chinese cultural relics. The total number of items is incalculable, according to Xinhua.

Among these are several artifacts the association is specifically demanding be returned, such as three Chinese stone lions looted from Northeast China's Liaoning Province. Two of them are displayed outside the notorious Yasukuni Shrine, while the third is housed in the Tochigi Prefecture. Another item is the Chinese Tang Honglu well Stele of the Tang Dynasty (618-907), looted from Dalian, Northeast China's Liaoning Province, in 1908 and currently stored out of public view in the Fukiage Garden of Japan's Imperial Palace as "national property," according to Xinhua.

Ichinose told the Global Times that since March 2022, the association has been sending formal requests to the Yasukuni Shrine demanding the return of Chinese cultural property. It was not until May 18, 2023, that they secured their first - and so far only - meeting with shrine staff.

"That day, we spoke with the Yasukuni Shrine's general affairs director and section chief," Ichinose recalled. 

"We submitted a second request on July 26, 2023. On August 9, we received a response saying there were 'no developments to report at this time.'"

"Still, we submitted a third request on October 4, 2023. On October 18, we got a reply stating that Yasukuni had already 'expressed its stance' and would not offer another meeting," he said.

"At the same year, We sent a fourth petition on November 30, and received a reply on December 13, that was essentially a repeat of their previous response," Ichinose said. "Even when we presented new evidence, the shrine refused to comment. We will continue to press firmly to prevent them from thinking this issue can simply be ignored." 

The Chinese Tang Honglu well Stele is considered one of the most significant Chinese artifacts looted by Japan. Ichinose said the association had attempted to negotiate with the Imperial Household Agency through a Japanese lawmaker. However, when the supportive lawmaker lost his seat, talks stalled. The group is currently reaching out to other lawmakers in hopes of reviving the discussion.

Today, many Western countries are returning cultural artifacts looted during colonial times, but Japan shows a negative attitude. Ichinose pointed out this stems from the Japanese government's failure to fully reflect on its history of aggression and colonization. As a result, Tokyo has little intention of addressing these lingering historical injustices, including the return of looted artifacts.

According to him, the Chinese Cultural Relics Return Movement Promotion Association holds regular meetings every month to discuss future actions. Each year, it also organizes two major public gatherings calling on the Japanese government to return looted Chinese relics.

When the association was established in 2021, Ichinose found, very few Japanese people - apart from a handful of scholars - were even aware of Japan's looting of Chinese cultural property.

In recent years, as the group's efforts expanded, media attention increased, and more citizens began voluntarily participating in its events.

"Returning looted Chinese artifacts should have been resolved in the last century," Ichinose told the Global Times. "It keeps getting delayed. As Japanese citizens, we believe it's our responsibility to urge the government to act - we cannot pass this burden on to the next generation."

Return of a mummy head

On May 12, 2025, Egypt's Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced it had recovered 25 smuggled cultural relics of significant historical and artistic value following negotiations with the US, marking the country's latest success in reclaiming looted artifacts, Xinhua reported. 
Mohamed Ismail Khaled, secretary-general of Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities, told the Global Times that since 2014, Egypt has successfully retrieved more than 30,000 cultural artifacts.

"As someone who has long worked in the field of cultural repatriation, I know that behind every returned artifact lies the tireless effort and perseverance of many people. These relics are not just witnesses of history - they are essential components of our national cultural identity," he said.

In August 2024, three smuggled artifacts, which belong to the Late Period of Ancient Egypt (747-332 BC), were returned to Egypt from the Netherlands: a blue porcelain ushabti statue, part of a wooden coffin decorated with inscriptions of goddess Isis, and a head of mummy in a good state of preservation with remains of teeth and hair, the Egyptian Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities said in a statement, Xinhua reported.

Khaled said the figurine and coffin fragment were found inside an antique store in the Netherlands, and the Dutch and Egyptian authorities conducted necessary investigations that showed they were illegally smuggled from Egypt, reported Xinhua.

A Dutch individual handed over the mummified head, which he had inherited from a family member, to local authorities, according to AP News.

According to Egyptian media, Leiden University later conducted a chemical analysis of the resin preservatives on the mummified head. The composition matched mummies excavated in Alexandria from the same period, and the skull bore surgical perforations consistent with medical texts from Egypt's Ptolemaic Dynasty (305-30 BC). On this basis, Dutch authorities decided to return the mummy head to Egypt.

Although Egypt has made notable strides in recovering artifacts, Professor Alnajib Alabdulla from the Department of History at Cairo University told the Global Times that the repatriation process remains deeply challenging.

First, many relics were taken illegally decades or even centuries ago, and there is often little documentation or hard evidence, which severely hampers recovery efforts. Second, the legal systems and cultural policies of different countries vary widely, complicating negotiations. Lastly, some artifacts are now in private collections or on the auction market, making it extremely time- and resource-intensive to trace their provenance, according to Alabdulla.

Alabdulla said that Egypt plans to sign more bilateral agreements and long-term cooperation mechanisms on cultural protection and restitution. The country will also build a comprehensive digital database to document each artifact for easier identification and tracking.

Restoring African dignity

Recently, at the National Museum of Ethnology in Leiden, the Netherlands, a staff member wearing blue latex gloves carefully removed a priceless artifact from its display, gently placed it on a padded surface, and wrapped it in several layers of special protective paper. 

According to AFP, the item was a Benin Bronze, an invaluable artifact looted from present-day Nigeria more than 120 years ago. It is now being prepared for repatriation.

Rev. Anamah N.U.B, head of the Cultural Industries and Heritage at Nigeria's Ministry of Art, Culture, Tourism and the Creative Economy, told the Global Times that as an ancient African civilization, Nigeria has spent decades working to reclaim its looted cultural heritage.

Anamah said that in recent years, Nigeria's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has led the charge in recovering these treasures. 
As a result, countries such as the UK, the US, and Germany have already returned or committed to returning certain artifacts.

"However, some countries or institutions in possession of looted relics often show reluctance to return them," Anamah said. 

He said that these countries should not only return the artifacts but also pay reparations to the source nations, as they have benefited economically from these items over the past centuries.

As the global push for artifact repatriation gains momentum, not only governments but also civil organizations are playing a crucial role in driving the process forward.

One such organization is Open Restitution Africa, founded in 2020. It aims to reshape the global narrative to center African voices in heritage discourse.

Members of Open Restitution Africa shared extensive documentation with the Global Times, detailing the historical significance of various African artifacts, their illicit removal from the continent, and the current status of their repatriation efforts.

In 1830, the Véro brothers, French specimen makers, exhumed the remains of a warrior in what is now around Botswana and South Africa and turned the body into a display specimen. After changing hands several times, the remains were put on public display in 1916 at a museum in Spain, under the label "The Negro of Banyoles," according to the BBC. 

For decades, the exhibit went unchallenged - until 1991, when Alphonse Arcelin, a Haitian doctor of African descent, wrote to Banyoles authorities demanding the remains be returned for burial. 

His call was initially met with resistance from local politicians and the public. Following years of intense negotiations, the human remains were returned home in 2000.

According to the Open Restitution Africa, returning the remains of "The Negro of Banyoles" and ensuring a proper burial was vital - not only for restoring the dignity of the deceased but also for affirming the dignity of all the people of Africa.


Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Force cannot bring peace to Middle East – this is a consensus in international community

A plume of heavy smoke rises over an oil refinery in southern of Tehran, after it was hit in an overnight Israeli strike, on June 15, 2025. Photo: AFP

On Monday, the conflict between Israel and Iran entered its fourth day, with both sides escalating the intensity of their confrontation in a cycle of tit-for-tat violence. The mutual attacks have not only resulted in casualties and infrastructure damage but have also set a dangerous precedent by targeting nuclear and energy facilities, sparking deep concerns within the international community about the potential for the situation to spiral out of control.

Israel and Iran are both important countries in the Middle East. The relationship between Israel and Iran bears on the overall situation of war and peace in the Middle East. The urgent task is to immediately take measures to avoid the escalation of the conflict, prevent the region from falling into greater turmoil, and return to the track of resolving issues through diplomatic means. Member of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee and Foreign Minister Wang Yi held separate phone calls with the Iranian and Israeli foreign ministers, calling on both sides to resolve differences through dialogue. Relevant parties need to take measures immediately to put a brake on the escalation of the conflict and bring down the temperature of the situation. Russia, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom have also expressed a willingness to mediate. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres wrote on social media: "Israeli bombardment of Iranian nuclear sites. Iranian missile strikes in Tel Aviv. Enough escalation. Time to stop. Peace and diplomacy must prevail."

It is crucial to fully recognize that only by upholding the vision of common security can the legitimate concerns of all parties be thoroughly addressed. Why are maximum pressure and preemptive action not viable paths? The long and troubled history of the Iran nuclear issue itself proves this point. On the surface, the conflict appears to be triggered by the "nuclear" question, but at its core, it is yet another manifestation of a deep-rooted security dilemma. Israel, fearing that Iran's development of nuclear weapons poses a threat to its security, has adopted a "preemptive" strategy. However, its actions that infringe upon Iran's sovereignty, security, and territorial integrity have, in turn, led to greater insecurity for itself. In fact, the moment when the Iran nuclear issue came closest to resolution was not achieved through a "preemptive" strike; rather, it was the result of 13 years of "marathon" negotiations and the greatest collective efforts by the international community, culminating in the achievement of a binding comprehensive agreement in 2015. Had it not been for the US later withdrawing from the deal, and had the agreement been earnestly and fully implemented, both Iran and Israel would clearly be much safer today.

Ancient Roman scholar Marcus Tullius Cicero once pointed out: "Most people think that the achievements of war are more important than those of peace; but this opinion needs to be corrected." The late former president of Israel, Shimon Peres, expressed a similar sentiment: "The real triumph is in the harvest of peace, not in the seeds of another war." The many military conflicts in the history of the Middle East have not quelled disputes; rather, they have planted the seeds for future confrontations. The vicious cycle of violence and confrontation has deepened divisions among countries in the region, making the path to peacefully resolving disputes increasingly difficult. To break free from bloodshed and turmoil, the Middle East must first abandon the old mind-set of "beggaring thy neighbor" and embrace a new security vision that is common, comprehensive, cooperative, and sustainable.

It is important to recognize that, despite differing positions and philosophies among regional countries on security issues, there are still common interests. Only through dialogue, rather than confrontation, can differences and antagonism be reduced and the broadest possible foundation for cooperation be found.

As a country with special influence over Israel, the US should particularly take on its due responsibility as a major power in both words and actions. For a long time, the general impression has been that the US hardly plays a constructive role in alleviating regional conflicts, but it excels at destructive actions. The ongoing fires of conflict in the Middle East are closely related to the "visible hand" of external powers. Many analysts believe that the US attempt to force Iran to yield through "maximum pressure" has been a significant factor in the sudden escalation of tensions between Israel and Iran. In an editorial, Singapore's Lianhe Zaobao stated that Washington had previously given Iran 60 days to reach a nuclear deal, and Israel launched its attack on the 61st day, "showing the diplomatic tacit understanding of both sides playing the roles of good cop and bad cop." A New York Times article last year compared the US to lion, the "king of the Middle East jungle" and Iran to a "parasitic wasp," claiming that in order to "kill the wasp," the US needs to "set fire to the whole jungle." This kind of thinking is extremely dangerous.

The security concerns of Middle Eastern countries need to be addressed, and military force cannot bring peace to the region. This is a common consensus in the international community, including China. Currently, diplomatic means regarding the Iranian nuclear issue have not been exhausted, and a peaceful resolution is still possible. Most importantly, both parties in the conflict and relevant stakeholders should take immediate measures to create conditions for returning to dialogue and negotiation to resolve the issues. Global Times editorial



RELATED ARTICLES

Friday, May 16, 2025

How China went from 19th-century subjugation to global superpower

 





Wednesday, May 7, 2025

Fostering a right view of WWII history essential for upholding international fairness and justice

>  

;


Photo: VCG


Chinese President Xi Jinping will pay a state visit to Russia from May 7 to 10 and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Great Patriotic War in Moscow, at the invitation of President Vladimir Putin of the Russian Federation. This year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory of the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, the Great Patriotic War of the Soviet Union and the World Anti-Fascist War. Xi's Russia visit will not only deepen bilateral ties at the level of head-of-state diplomacy but will also hold broader significance for the world.

The international order is currently facing multiple shocks, and the underlying causes are closely linked to the erosion of the view of the World War II (WWII) history. 

The rise of unilateralism has broken with the post-war tradition of multilateral cooperation; the spread of historical revisionism has intensified the fragmentation of international norms; and the resurgence of exclusionary ideologies has led to social division. Some right-wing politicians use various means to obscure and distort the history of WWII, while others seek to gain political benefits and solidify their positions by whitewashing fascism. Even more dangerously, the flawed historical view is feeding a vicious cycle alongside geopolitical conflicts: In an attempt at containment, they denigrate - or even deny - the historical contributions of China and Russia; and in the name of a "free and open Indo-Pacific," they seek to breach the pacifist postwar constitution and resurrect military adventurism.

Against this backdrop, the joint advocacy by China and Russia to foster a right view of the WWII history, defend the outcomes of the victory in the war and the post-war international order, and uphold international fairness and justice serves as an important guiding force for maintaining world peace and stability.

The war that successfully ended 80 years ago was fundamentally a battle between justice and evil. It was a magnificent feat of the international community overcoming boundaries of nation, race, and ideology to unite against fascist aggression. From the Normandy landings in Europe to the Pacific theater in Asia, from the Battle of Stalingrad to China's brave resistance against Japanese invasion, and across Asia, Africa, and Latin America, countries joined forces in an unprecedented effort to defeat the Axis powers' imperial ambitions. This demonstrated the unparalleled power of multilateral cooperation in the face of global threats. 

We will also never forget that the victory of the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression was inseparable from the robust support of the international community. The Soviet Union's dispatch of troops to Northeast China hastened the collapse of Japanese imperialism; the US supplied China with aircraft and artillery under the Lend-Lease; and the 1943 Cairo Declaration expressly demanded that Japan return all the Chinese territories it had seized - including Taiwan. 80 years ago, the vast majority of the world's nations stood shoulder to shoulder against a common foe in pursuit of a shared ideal of peace - a fact that all humanity should remember forever.

The victory in WWII was a triumph of multilateral cooperation that transcended different systems and beliefs, overcoming fascist tyranny. This proves that the law of the jungle, where the strong prey on the weak, is not the right path for human development. It laid the foundation for an international order centered on the United Nations and gave rise to a wave of national liberation and peaceful development based on equality and self-determination among all nations. Fostering a right view of WWII history is also about defending a proper view of the international order.

The construction of the postwar international system further proved that multilateralism is not a temporary strategy in the game of great powers, but a conscious choice of civilization born from immense sacrifice. As the main theater in the East during World War II, China was not only a significant contributor to the World Anti-Fascist War but also a builder and maintainer of the post-war international order. China has always advocated the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence and has played a constructive role in alleviating regional crises through active diplomatic mediation. From proposing the concept of building a community with a shared future for mankind to introducing three major global initiatives, China is actively demonstrating what it means to uphold and defend a right view of WWII history. It is providing the world with a Chinese solution that transcends zero-sum games and promotes the development of the international order in a just and reasonable direction.

Standing at the crossroads of changes unseen in a century, humanity needs to learn from historical experience of WWII victory more than ever. As former German president Richard von Weizaecker said, "those who do not review history will be blind to reality." Promoting a correct understanding of World War II is inherently linked to upholding a just international order. Whether mediating regional conflicts or addressing global crises, countries must learn from history and adhere to the just principles established after the war. Only by anchoring ourselves in a correct historical perspective can humanity maintain a baseline of peace amid potential risks of de-globalization and conflict.

"Justice will prevail! Peace will prevail! The people will prevail!" These slogans were shouted by the Guard of Honor of the Chinese People's Liberation Army during the nighttime rehearsal for the Victory Day parade on May 9 in Moscow's Red Square, eliciting waves of cheers and applause from the audience. The three declarations of "will prevail" and the warm reception of the PLA are concrete manifestations of the appreciation and support for upholding and promoting a right view of WWII history. More people standing on the side of defending the right view of WWII history and upholding post-war international fairness and justice is the best way to commemorate the victory of the World Anti-Fascist War. - Global Times editorial

RELATED ARTICLES
China and Russia, through their cooperation in AI, can set a great example and contribute to the emancipation of the Global South in the realms of science, culture and education, says Russian exper

Thursday, March 13, 2025

Inspired to serve by the legacy of Sun Yat Sen, who shaped modern China

 

Shining Sun: Honouring Dr Sun at the 100th anniversary of his demise at the Sun Yat Sen Museum in George Town, Penang. (Below) Dr Yee sharing some of the stories he was told while growing up about Dr Sun, at the Sun Yat Sen Museum. — ZHAFARAN NASIB/The Star


GEORGE TOWN: They are both medical doctors who share the same birthday on Nov 12.

And just like Father of Modern China the late Dr Sun Yat Sen, octogenarian Datuk Seri Dr Yee Thiam Sun had embarked on a path dedicating his life to serving the people.

At 81, Dr Yee continues to work from his clinic in Lebuh Carnavon treating patients and offering consultations at a discounted rate.

The buck does not stop there as the calm and humble Dr Yee also wears many other hats being a Scout leader, JCI (Junior Chamber International) leader, St John Ambulance of Malaysia, Penang commander, UN Youth leader, senior logistician who has been actively involved in humanitarian logistics movements, holding the title of Fellow of LogM (FLogM/Senior Logistician) and the position of honorary president of LogM.

He has also been mentoring and providing opportunities to leaders, especially young ones, through his involvement with Scouts, St John, JCI, SMJKs, SJKCs, and other organisations.

Dr Yee was a King’s Scout (1961) and has received many awards from various organisations, including the government, Scouts and St John.

Datuk Seri Dr Yee Thiam Sun sharing the stories he was told growing up about Dr Sun Yat Sen, during the gathering of the 100th anniversary of his demise at the Sun Yat Sen Museum in George Town, Penang. (March 8, 2025) — ZHAFARAN NASIB/The Star.Datuk Seri Dr Yee Thiam Sun sharing the stories he was told growing up about Dr Sun Yat Sen, during the gathering of the 100th anniversary of his demise at the Sun Yat Sen Museum in George Town, Penang. (March 8, 2025) — ZHAFARAN NASIB/The Star.

The Yang di-Pertua Negeri of Penang had also conferred him the Darjah Gemilang Pangkuan Negeri (DGPN), which carries the title Datuk Seri.

Dr Yee recalled that his late grandfather had served as the Chinese political and revolutionary leader’s secretary while Dr Sun was in Penang.

“While growing up, my mother, whose birthday also fell on the same day as mine and Dr Sun’s, used to tell me about how Dr Sun had dedicated his life to serving and helping the people.

“Her stories had left a lasting impression on me and I too wanted to serve the people in some way or another.

“I adopted Dr Sun’s motto to serve the people by running a clinic and charging less so that people do not feel the pinch.

“To be able to do this, I decided to work on my own because if I worked for others, I would not be able to charge less,” he said when met at the memorial event held at the Sun Yat Sen Museum Penang in Armenian Street to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the passing of Dr Sun.

Dr Yee also said that his maternal grandfather was an active supporter and spent most of his money on Dr Sun’s movement.

“My grandfather was a writer, and so he wrote for Dr Sun too,” he said.

Dr Yee added that despite his age, he wants to continue working to serve, just like his Dr Sun.

Businessman Dr Lawrence Khoo, in his 50s, said his grandfather was an ardent supporter of Dr Sun and had offered assistance in many ways.

“Dr Sun believed in education being of utmost importance and my grandfather as his supporter, started the Chung Ling High School and Penang Chinese Girls’ High School as well as Kwong Wah Yit Poh (a Chinese-language newspaper) here in Penang.

“We still follow his ideology that education is important and that women must be treated as equals.

“This has influenced me and I believe that we all need education and to be treated equally regardless of gender,” he said.

During the gathering, museum custodian Khoo Salma shared that a short video about how the Chinese community from other countries remember Dr Sun will be released on March 12, the actual death anniversary.

“Dr Sun was the towering figure of his time and the first provisional president of the China republic.

“He was a man with a vision who never gave up,” she said.

At the museum, Khoo said they share his (Dr Sun’s) story daily with visitors.

“This keeps his story alive.”

Born in 1866 in Guangdong province in China, Dr Sun studied medicine in Hong Kong and became a doctor.

He started his revolutionary career in 1894 and staged his first uprising in China a year later after forming Xing Zhong Hui in Honolulu.

He travelled around the world in search of support and came to Penang five times from 1906 to 1912.

Often called the “Father of Modern China”, Dr Sun played a key role in the overthrow of the Qing Dynasty in 1911.

He was the first provisional president when the Republic of China was established in 1912.

He passed away on March 12, 1925, after battling cancer.

Source link

Sun Yat-sen at 100: The revolutionary who shaped modern China

Wednesday, March 12, marks 100 years since the death of Chinese revolutionary and politician Sun Yat-sen, the “Father of the Nation.”

Sun was a Chinese revolutionary leader and political philosopher, often referred to as the "Father of Modern China" for his pivotal role in overthrowing the Qing dynasty and establishing the Republic of China. Born on November 12, 1866, in Cuiheng Village, Guangdong Province, Sun received a Western-style education in Hawaii and later studied medicine in Hong Kong. His exposure to Western ideas and the decline of the Qing dynasty fueled his determination to reform China.

Sun founded the Revive China Society in 1894, advocating for the overthrow of the Qing and the establishment of a modern republic. His revolutionary efforts culminated in the 1911 Xinhai Revolution, which ended over 2,000 years of imperial rule. On January 1, 1912, Sun was inaugurated as the provisional president of the Republic of China, though he soon stepped aside to promote unity.


Sun's political philosophy, the Three Principles of the People (nationalism, democracy, and people's livelihood), became the foundation of Chinese governance. Despite facing numerous challenges, including warlordism and foreign intervention, Sun remained committed to unifying China and modernizing its society. He reorganized the Nationalist Party (Kuomintang, or KMT) and formed alliances with the Communist Party of China to strengthen the revolutionary movement.

Sun passed away on March 12, 1925, in Beijing, leaving behind a legacy of revolution and reform. His ideas continue to influence both Taiwan and mainland China, where he is revered as a unifying figure.

Sun Yat-sen expressed his support for Zionism in a letter sent to N.E.B. Ezra, 24 April 1920. (credit: Abraham Schwadron Autograph Collection/National Library of Israel)Enlrage image
Sun Yat-sen expressed his support for Zionism in a letter sent to N.E.B. Ezra, 24 April 1920. (credit: Abraham Schwadron Autograph Collection/National Library of Israel)

The Zionism letter

There was also a fascinating discovery back in 2021, when a letter written by Sun to a Shanghai Jew expressed support for the Zionist cause.

In the letter, dated April 24, 1920, Sun voiced his enthusiastic backing for Zionism, describing it as “one of the greatest  movements of the present time.” 


"[I] wish to assure you of my sympathy for this movement – which is one of the greatest movements of the present time," Yat-sen's letters reads. "All lovers of Democracy cannot help but support whole-heartedly and welcome with enthusiasm the movement to restore your wonderful and historic nation, which has contributed so much to the civilization of the world and which rightfully deserve [sic] an honorable place in the family of nations."

It was addressed to N.E.B. Ezra, a prominent writer, publisher, and the founder of the Shanghai Zionist Association. 

Sun is celebrated for his role in shaping modern Chinese history, and while his endorsement of Zionism has long been documented and the contents of the letter were previously known, the original signed copy has only recently been rediscovered, more than a century after it was written.


nternal records from the National Library indicate that the letter was in its collection since at least 1938, though it was never publicly cataloged or accessible to researchers until now. The exact path by which the letter arrived at the library remains unclear. 

“N.E.B. Ezra passed away in 1936. The letter’s arrival by 1938 suggests that Ezra himself may have donated it, or someone else sent it to the library after recognizing its historical importance,” National Library archivist Rachel Misrati stated at the time.

Sun and other Chinese leaders maintained warm relations with Jewish communities and figures, both locally and internationally. Many of these connections were forged during Sun’s years of exile before the Qing dynasty’s fall. A notable example is Morris “Two-Gun” Cohen, a Polish-born Jewish bodyguard and advisor to Sun, who was also a staunch Zionist.


Sun’s support for Zionism was not unique among national leaders of the time. Many prominent political figures expressed similar sentiments, driven by both ideological alignment and practical considerations - in 1946, Vietnamese leader Ho Chi Minh spent several days staying in the same hotel as David Ben-Gurion in Paris, where the two would often visit each other.

Legacy

Sun Yat-sen is still widely revered in Taiwan as the founding father of the Republic of China (ROC), though his legacy has evolved over time. His status remains prominent in official state narratives, but the way he is perceived has changed, particularly as Taiwanese identity has developed over the years. 

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) of the mainland has also claimed Sun Yat-sen as part of its own revolutionary lineage, portraying him as an early forerunner of communism who opposed imperialism and laid the groundwork for modern China.